In respect to this, are grammar schools better than comprehensives?
Far from being bastions of social mobility, the average grammar school has fewer than 3% of their pupils on free school meals, compared to an average of 14% across the state sector. Once you factor in these differences in their intakes, grammar schools are no more effective than comprehensives.
Subsequently, question is, do grammar schools follow the national curriculum? They are not council-run, but are funded by the government, and often set up by parents, charities, businesses, and religious groups. Therefore, they do not need to follow a national curriculum and can set their own pay and conditions for teachers, but are not permitted to make a profit.
Secondly, are grammar schools good or bad?
Research from the University of Durham published in March suggested that grammar schools perform no better than non-selective state schools once their pupils' higher ability and wealth is taken into account.
What are the advantages of going to a grammar school?
Good results: Grammar schools get great academic results. This is not only because of the selection of more able pupils, but also because they can often be pushed harder due to a more equal level of ability in class.
